Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Rapinoe results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 2,081 hits . Analysis detected 15,674 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,202 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,954 of 16,562 topics). This Megan Rapinoe is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Megan Rapinoe
Topic details
Total words: 7,202
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.1% percentile 4.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 28.9% 28.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst