Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian Women's Soccer Team results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 626 hits . Analysis detected 2,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,698 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,352 of 16,562 topics). This Iranian Women's Soccer Team is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. Iranian Women's Soccer Team
Topic details
Total words: 1,698
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.8% percentile 9.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 36.9% 36.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 18.7% 18.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Horn Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst