Keyword summary
30%69 analyzed articles/videos30,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fifa World Cup results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 17,817 hits. Analysis detected 158,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 240,234 analyzed words across 69 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (33,295 of 34,317 keywords). This Fifa World Cup is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Fifa World Cup
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
3%Fifa World Cup (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751003.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score69 analyzed articles240.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate