Author summary
11% 2 analyzed articles/videos 567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Sirikul results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 431 hits . Analysis detected 1,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,067 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,095 of 6,382 authors). This Laura Sirikul is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Laura Sirikul
Author details
Total words: 3,067
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.1% 14.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.6% 6.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst