Publication summary
44% 99 analyzed articles/videos 59,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forbes results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 17,935 hits . Analysis detected 235,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 302,498 analyzed words across 99 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 26% (281 of 379 publications). This Forbes is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 302,498
Article count: 99
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score99 analyzed articles302.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst