Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Dexter Palmer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 358 hits . Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,422 of 6,316 authors). This Ian Dexter Palmer is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Ian Dexter Palmer
Author details
Total words: 1,944
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.5% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 18.4% 18.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.4% 15.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 15.4% 15.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst