Author summary
23% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ph.D. results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 2,532 hits . Analysis detected 25,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,313 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,692 of 6,312 authors). This Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 40,313
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles40.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst