Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,085 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Seladi-Schulman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 375 hits . Analysis detected 1,760 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (6,282 of 6,316 authors). This Jill Seladi-Schulman is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Jill Seladi-Schulman
Author details
Total words: 8,340
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst