Publication summary
0% 20 analyzed articles/videos 14,726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthline results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 5,787 hits . Analysis detected 35,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 68,375 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (366 of 410 publications). This Healthline is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 68,375
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score20 analyzed articles68.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst