Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cathy Cassata results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 2,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (5,276 of 6,628 authors). This Cathy Cassata is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Cathy Cassata
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠21%Cathy Cassata (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,352
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos