Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simina Findlay results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 507 hits . Analysis detected 3,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,412 of 6,629 authors). This Simina Findlay is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Simina Findlay
Author details
Total words: 5,532
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst