Author summary
77%4 analyzed articles/videos3,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MS results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,605 hits. Analysis detected 14,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,689 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,339 of 6,312 authors). This MS is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
MS
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
48%MS (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,689
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 12.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos