Author summary
77% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MS results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,605 hits . Analysis detected 14,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,689 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,339 of 6,312 authors). This MS is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. MS
Author details
Total words: 12,689
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 12.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst