Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kanitra Caston results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 455 hits . Analysis detected 3,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,217 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,608 authors). This Kanitra Caston is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kanitra Caston
Author details
Total words: 2,217
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 20.5% 20.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.7% 15.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 20.5%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst