Publication summary
80% 10 analyzed articles/videos 9,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Lens results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 2,831 hits . Analysis detected 26,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,771 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 33% (269 of 398 publications). This The Lens is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 34,771
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles34.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst