Author summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vivi Smilgius results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 413 hits . Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,596 of 6,359 authors). This Vivi Smilgius is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Vivi Smilgius
Author details
Total words: 4,134
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst