Author summary
46% 1 analyzed article/video 2,953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capital B results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 785 hits . Analysis detected 4,304 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,859 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,469 of 6,169 authors). This Capital B is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Capital B
Author details
Total words: 8,859
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst