The Lens76%

The Lens Earns 11 Honors at Press Club of New Orleans Journalism Awards 10%

By Mark Moseley15%

7/20/2026, 5:51:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 238 faulty-reasoning hits from 410 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,700 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the article peer group.

The Lens won three first-place awards and eight additional honors Saturday night at the Press Club of New Orleans’ 68th annual Excellence in Journalism gala. 
The top awards spanned the full range of how The Lens tells its stories; in print, pictures and out loud: 
Editor Katy Reckdahl won Feature Reporting  Serious Feature for “Explaining Jessie Hoffman.” 
Over time, Katy has received more than 25 first-place Press Club awards. 
Photojournalist Gus Bennett won Best Multi-Photo Feature for “To Combat Violence, Young Rollers Offer a Happier Alternative: New Orleans Culture.” 
Producer Carolyne Heldman won Best Podcast for Behind the Lens  the show's third consecutive first-place finish. 
In all, eleven Lens entries were finalists across ten categories this year, with recognition throughout the newsroom. 
Of Reckdahl's story, the judges wrote: “Gripping from beginning to end. 
This emotionally complex feature repeatedly challenges the reader's moral perspective while revealing the lasting impact of generational trauma in a deeply memorable way.” 
With three honors, Bennett was The Lens’ most-decorated journalist of the night, including both first and second place in Best Multi-Photo Feature, where his “Sheltering in Place through the ICE Storm” joined “Young Rollers” at the top of the category. 
The full list: 
1st Place, Feature Reporting  Serious Feature: Katy Reckdahl, “Explaining Jessie Hoffman“ 
1st Place, Best Multi-Photo Feature: Gus Bennett, “To Combat Violence, Young Rollers Offer a Happier Alternative: New Orleans Culture“ 
1st Place, Best Podcast: Carolyne Heldman, Behind the Lens 
2nd Place, General News Reporting: Delaney Nolan, “Rust and Corrosion Threaten Levee Steel Pumps and Supports“ 
2nd Place, Medical/Health Reporting: La’Shance Perry, “New Orleans Health Department Launches a Misoprostol Map“ 
2nd Place, Lifestyle Reporting: Mizani Ball, “Taking in Parades Together, but Apart“ 
2nd Place, Best Multi-Photo Feature: Gus Bennett, “Sheltering in Place through the ICE Storm“ 
3rd Place, Investigative Reporting: Delaney Nolan, “‘They tricked me’: Migrants feel deceived by ICE after being promised $1,000 to voluntarily depart“ 
3rd Place, Education Reporting: Marta Jewson, “The Long Arc of John McDonogh Senior High School“ 
3rd Place, Best Feature Photo: Gus Bennett, “Last Call at the First and Last Stop“ 
3rd Place, Best News Photo: La’Shance Perry, photograph accompanying “Despite Spotty Track Record, Venture Global to Become Picture of New Federal ‘Energy Dominance‘“ 
Our reporting has more urgency than ever. 
Sign up to get the latest news on New Orleans and the Gulf South sent directly to your inbox. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 4.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Mark Moseley: 1.4%The Lens: 2.8%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 1.6%The Lens: 8.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 9.8%Mark Moseley: 3.3%The Lens: 0.5%Status Quo Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.6%The Lens: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Mark Moseley: 0.6%The Lens: 1.4%Pessimism Bias1.7%This article: 2.7%Mark Moseley: 0.9%The Lens: 8.2%Negativity Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Mark Moseley: 9.4%The Lens: 0.9%Halo Effect12.7%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.3%Mark Moseley: 2.4%The Lens: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%Mark Moseley: 3.7%The Lens: 0.6%Unattributed Quote2.7%This article: 2.7%Mark Moseley: 0.9%The Lens: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 9.8%Mark Moseley: 6.8%The Lens: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice9.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 2.1%The Lens: 2.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 2.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Moseley: 0.0%The Lens: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Mark Moseley: 4.6%The Lens: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.6%

410 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers54%attributed speech190writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKaty Reckdahl • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGus Bennett • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCarolyne Heldman • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKaty Reckdahl • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGus Bennett • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCarolyne Heldman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDelaney Nolan • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLa’Shance Perry • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMizani Ball • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGus Bennett • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDelaney Nolan • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMarta Jewson • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGus Bennett • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLa’Shance Perry • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Carolyne Heldman

65%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words12% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Biased Writer Voice+53.3 ptsWriter: 12.1%Carolyne Heldman: 65.4%65.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Carolyne Heldman: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Carolyne Heldman: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Carolyne Heldman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.