Author summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristina Virro results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 983 hits . Analysis detected 4,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,364 of 6,258 authors). This Kristina Virro is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Kristina Virro
Author details
Total words: 4,528
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.7% 21.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst