Publication summary
43% 56 analyzed articles/videos 33,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Psychology Today results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 17,757 hits . Analysis detected 143,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 189,597 analyzed words across 56 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 30% (289 of 410 publications). This Psychology Today is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 189,597
Article count: 56
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score56 analyzed articles189.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst