Opening the Door to the Subconscious 72%

By Ran D. Anbar M.D.86%

7/21/2026, 4:40:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 920 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (6,252 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the article peer group.

The conscious mind thrives on stimulation from inputs like language, sound, comparisons, and problem solving. 
When sensory and cognitive input decreases—when we become quiet—we make room for subconscious regulation and guidance. 
It’s not a coincidence that so many of our quietest practices—prayer, meditation, time spent in nature—are also the practices we can use to feel a sense of peace and calm. 
Interestingly, there are key differences between inner quiet and outer silence. 
Outer silence—the absence of environmental noise—sometimes makes us feel more alert rather than less (Donnelly, 2023). 
For people unaccustomed to stillness, this kind of quiet may feel uncomfortable at first, like your mind is scanning for threats. 
Consider it conditioning; with routine and practice the quiet will become familiar and embraced by your mind. 
The goal, of course, is *inner* quiet. 
When mental noise decreases and tension settles, the nervous system shifts away from vigilance. 
Human cultures recognized this reality long before neuroscience could describe it. 
Moments of silence, contemplative prayer, monastic practices, and days of rest all create conditions in which conscious driving recedes and deeper regulation emerges. 
Nature, Awe, and Feeling Small 
A powerful way to relinquish conscious control and open communication with the subconscious is through experiences that make us feel both small and part of something vast. 
One of my 20-year-old patients, Sophia, reported experiencing a life-changing vision from her subconscious that gave her this feeling. 
In her freshman year of college, she fell asleep in her dorm. 
During her nap, she felt her soul move out of her body and toward a ball of energy and light, which she then entered. 
Inside that energy, she envisioned the world from its very beginning—the Big Bang, the origin of Earth, the sprouting of the first tree, the ages of fish and dinosaurs and mammals. 
She witnessed storms and fires and tectonic plates shifting—all from a great distance where she felt safe and clear in the knowing that everything was happening as it should be. 
When the vision ended, my patient felt disoriented. 
She did not recognize her room or even her own hands. 
But she heard the voice of her subconscious, soothing and calm, telling her who she was and where she’d been. 
Later, when we asked her subconscious why Sophia had this experience, it replied, *I wanted to show her a bigger life. 
* 
Her guided, awe-filled tour of the universe did just that, by showing Sophia how much she is an integral part of something vast and wonderful. 
Interestingly, the use of psychedelics in *supervised therapy* sometimes elicits a similar sense to what Sophia experienced. 
Patients report feeling a temporary loss of their sense of self and a blurring of the boundaries between themselves and the world. 
Many describe feeling unity with other people, with nature, and with the cosmos. 
These awe-filled experiences can broaden our mindsets and allow us to feel part of something bigger (Soylemez, 2025). 
When we feel awe—perhaps when we view a sweeping landscape, a night sky, or the expansiveness of the ocean—our focus on ourselves diminishes. 
These things make us feel small in the best possible way—small because we’re part of something vast and beautiful and cohesive. 
When we feel this way, our immediate concerns shrink. 
Our perception of time can even soften. 
Among my patients who've mastered the skill of allowing the subconscious take over, many report losing any sense of passing time. 
Ten minutes in hypnosis, for example, might feel like hours of calm contemplation. 
Awe, like outer silence, is not the goal. 
Rather, it’s a pathway to feelings of peace and calm, which allows us to better interact with our inner selves. 
Communication with the Subconscious 
The subconscious communicates differently than the conscious mind. 
Our conscious minds lean heavily on language. 
Words are our way of defining our circumstances. 
The subconscious, however developed long before language, and is more oriented towards feelings and images than towards words (LeDoux, 1996). 
Many of my patients who have directly communicated with their subconscious have felt limited by, and even expressed frustration with, the limitations that come with having to capture big feelings or concepts in words. 
The sense I get is not that these people lack the ability to use language, but rather that language itself is a *limiting tool*. 
Imagine a composer being asked to work at a piano with only ten keys instead of the standard 88, and you begin to grasp the inherent disparity between the vastness of the human experience and the narrowness of the lexicon available to describe it. 
Takeaway 
If getting in touch with our subconscious can benefit us, why aren’t we all doing it? 
In the Western world, most of us not only fail to seek subconscious help, but we actively inhibit our ability to be open to subconscious messages, mysterious connections, and other phenomena that don’t fit within the strict limitations we keep in our thoughts. 
We end up with this limited way of thinking because it simplifies our life experience. 
However, it is this limited experience that leads to much strife in the world, as many of us think in a simplistic way. 
For instance, it is simple to believe that everyone should think in the same way or that there is only one right way to behave. 
We then may become agitated when we meet someone who holds a different view. 
I believe the world would be a better place if all of us were in closer touch with our subconscious minds. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.8%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 9.2%Psychology Today: 3.8%Confirmation Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 7.3%Psychology Today: 2.7%Availability Heuristic11.4%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.8%Psychology Today: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.3%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.8%Psychology Today: 0.3%Hindsight Bias2.3%This article: 3.3%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 1.1%Psychology Today: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 2.2%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.7%Psychology Today: 2.7%Framing Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 4.3%Psychology Today: 4.4%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 1.6%Psychology Today: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 3.2%Psychology Today: 4.1%Negativity Bias9.5%This article: 2.6%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.9%Psychology Today: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias2.6%This article: 1.5%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 1.0%Psychology Today: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.5%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 1.6%Psychology Today: 0.7%In-Group Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 3.1%Psychology Today: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.8%Psychology Today: 1.1%Halo Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.6%Psychology Today: 0.9%Recency Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.1%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 2.8%Psychology Today: 5.5%Appeal to Authority7.1%This article: 7.1%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 2.4%Psychology Today: 2.6%False Dilemma7.1%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.7%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.9%Psychology Today: 0.4%Circular Reasoning2.7%This article: 16.8%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 14.2%Psychology Today: 9.4%Hasty Generalization16.8%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.7%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.6%Psychology Today: 0.5%Bandwagon1.7%This article: 9.7%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 6.6%Psychology Today: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion9.7%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 22.4%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 9.4%Psychology Today: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.4%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.3%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 1.1%Psychology Today: 0.5%Appeal to Nature3.3%This article: 2.5%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.8%Psychology Today: 0.7%Composition/Division2.5%This article: 31.7%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 22.5%Psychology Today: 3.4%Anecdotal31.7%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.5%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 1.2%Psychology Today: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 1.6%Psychology Today: 1.0%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 2.2%Psychology Today: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice4.0%This article: 6.8%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 6.2%Psychology Today: 6.0%Indoctrination6.8%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ran D. Anbar M.D.: 0.0%Psychology Today: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

920 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.