Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mindfulness results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 3,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,019 of 16,562 topics). This Mindfulness is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Mindfulness
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,760
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 22.5%22.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos