Author summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ran D. Anbar M.D. results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 622 hits . Analysis detected 3,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,778 of 6,364 authors). This Ran D. Anbar M.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Ran D. Anbar M.D.
Author details
Total words: 2,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 22.5% 22.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.2% 6.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.2% 14.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Author 22.5%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst