Author summary
ā 19% 1 analyzed article/video 902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gurit E. Birnbaum results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 417 hits . Analysis detected 2,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,331 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ā 24% (4,809 of 6,316 authors). This Gurit E. Birnbaum is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Gurit E. Birnbaum
Author details
Total words: 5,331
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.8% 7.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst