Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Laura Bilbao Broch MSc results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 2,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,351 authors). This Laura Bilbao Broch MSc is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Laura Bilbao Broch MSc
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Laura Bilbao Broch MSc (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos