Author summary
31% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,046 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Krauss Whitbourne PhD results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 2,553 hits . Analysis detected 15,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,153 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,378 of 6,369 authors). This Susan Krauss Whitbourne PhD is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Susan Krauss Whitbourne PhD
Author details
Total words: 24,153
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles24.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst