Author summary
36% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ABPP results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 3,126 hits . Analysis detected 22,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,184 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,835 of 6,628 authors). This ABPP is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. ABPP
Author details
Total words: 35,184
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst