Author summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey S. Nevid results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 729 hits. Analysis detected 3,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (1,948 of 6,359 authors). This Jeffrey S. Nevid is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Jeffrey S. Nevid
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠70%Jeffrey S. Nevid (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510069.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos