Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Guy Winch Ph.D. results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Overconfidence Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 166 hits . Analysis detected 1,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,211 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Guy Winch Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Guy Winch Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 2,211
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst