Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meredith Gordon L.C.S.W. results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 2,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,661 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,244 of 6,628 authors). This Meredith Gordon L.C.S.W. is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. Meredith Gordon L.C.S.W.
Author details
Total words: 2,661
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.3% 15.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.1% 2.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst