Author summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 1,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amir Levine Ph.D. results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 383 hits . Analysis detected 2,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,932 of 6,378 authors). This Amir Levine Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Amir Levine Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst