Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Melanie Jay results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 687 hits . Analysis detected 3,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 88% (815 of 6,316 authors). This Dr. Melanie Jay is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Dr. Melanie Jay
Author details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.1% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 36.7% 36.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.1% 8.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 36.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst