Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,793 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Cohut results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 673 hits . Analysis detected 6,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,105 of 6,628 authors). This Maria Cohut is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Maria Cohut
Author details
Total words: 7,172
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.4% 3.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst