Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott M. Hayes results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 1,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,092 of 6,629 authors). This Scott M. Hayes is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Scott M. Hayes
Author details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst