Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These MAPP results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 522 hits . Analysis detected 3,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This MAPP is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. MAPP
Author details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.7% 19.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 18.0% 18.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 18.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst