Author summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Ergenzinger J.D. results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 299 hits . Analysis detected 2,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,522 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,230 of 6,372 authors). This Ed Ergenzinger J.D. is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Ed Ergenzinger J.D.
Author details
Total words: 6,522
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst