Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Greene results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 821 hits . Analysis detected 4,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,955 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (867 of 6,316 authors). This Peter Greene is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Peter Greene
Author details
Total words: 2,955
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.3% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.8% 27.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 24.0% 24.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 27.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 24.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst