Author summary
70% 7 analyzed articles/videos 8,490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Baxter results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 3,598 hits . Analysis detected 31,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,125 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,680 of 6,244 authors). This Kevin Baxter is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Kevin Baxter
Author details
Total words: 32,125
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles32.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst