News Analysis: Argentina lost more than the World Cup final. It lost its class and decorum 57%

By Kevin Baxter71%

7/20/2026, 11:27:16 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 432 hits. Analysis detected 2,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,131 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,539 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the article peer group.

This summer’s World Cup will be remembered for a lot of things. 
It was the first to be played in three countries, the first with 48 teams, and the overall attendance nearly doubled the previous record. 
Norway’s Erling Haaland and Cape Verde’s Vozinha were captivating while Egypt and Canada both won World Cup games for the first time, advancing to the round of 16. 
And Spain, glorious Spain, gave up just one goal in eight games to dethrone the reigning champions and become the first nation in history to own both the men’s and women’s World Cup titles at the same time. 
But the tournament will also be remembered for a classless and churlish Argentina, which forever stained itself with a thuggish performance in the game and an ungracious one afterward. 
If La Albiceleste had simply kept its composure, it would have secured a place next to Brazil and Germany, the only other countries to reach three finals in four World Cups, as one of the greatest teams of all time. 
Instead, some of its players turned the postgame handshakes into a brawl, with Argentine midfielder Leandro Paredes drawing a red card for grabbing Spain’s Eric Garcia by the throat and shoving him to the turf. 
It was believed to be the only red card ever handed out after a World Cup final, and the ignominy it brought was well-deserved. 
But the childishness was just beginning. 
When Spain assembled on the podium to accept the World Cup trophy, which had been Argentina’s moments earlier, the South Americans turned their backs. 
More than an hour later Lionel Messi, who has cemented his stature as the greatest player in World Cup history, soiled that status by leading the players out of the locker room and through a back exit to the team bus, avoiding the media many had been so eager to speak with during the team’s unbeaten run to the final. 
It was an attack on class and decorum as well as violation of FIFA rules, which require players to leave the stadium through a “mixed zone” accessible to media. 
They are not required to stop or speak, but certainly someone owed some accountability to the tens of thousands of fans in Argentine jerseys who packed Times Square and MetLife Stadium over the weekend and the millions in Argentina who filled plazas and town squares to watch the team play. 
“We’ve been great in victory and we need to be great in defeat,” Argentina coach Lionel Scaloni said moments after Paredes was booked for assault. 
“We have shown today that we know how to lose too. 
We lost the game and we accept that.” 
Scaloni, who did address the media, later broke down in tears. 
“I already cried all the tears I had in the dressing room,” he said in Spanish. 
Scaloni, 48, may be out of a job when his contract expires in December, but his message for the fans was don’t cry for me, Argentina. 
“It is hard to ask people to enjoy this equally. 
It is very hard to convince people that this is a triumph,” said Scaloni, who has lost just twice in 15 World Cup games. 
“When you win, not everything is good. 
When you lose, not everything is bad.” 
But while Argentina was being petty and petulant, Spain was practically perfect in every way. 
Not only did it concede just one goal in the tournament, but it also held Argentina without a shot into extra time Sunday  the first time that’s ever happened in a World Cup final  and ran its unbeaten streak to a record 38 games overall. 
The win, which came on substitute Ferran Torres’ goal moments into the second extra-time period  and less than 20 minutes after Argentina was reduced to 10 men when Enzo Fernández was given a second yellow card for a foolish tackle  not only made Spain the first country to be the men’s and women’s world champion at the same time, but also made it the first to be the men’s world, European and Olympic champion at the same time. 
No country in history has dominated the sport as Spain is dominating it now. 
And since Spain is the second-youngest team to win the World Cup in 56 years, La Roja could be on top for some time. 
“After the match, some of the players who have been with us the longest asked me, ‘Coach, what is left for us [to] win? 
We’ve won everything,’” said Spain’s manager Luis de la Fuente. 
“I told them, well the next match in September.” 
That’s a UEFA Nations League match with England, which finished third in this World Cup. 
A little further down the road is the 2030 World Cup, which Spain will co-host, making it the first country in history to defend its title at home. 
“When you arrive at a moment like today and think about the journey we’ve taken, you realize the importance of that process,” said De la Fuente, a former youth national team coach who managed many of the players on the World Cup team  among them Dani Olmo, Mikel Merino, Mikel Oyarzabal, Unai Simón, the tournament’s top goalkeeper, and Rodri, tournament’s top player  to U19 and U21 European titles. 
“We certainly wouldn’t be here today  we wouldn’t have achieved anything  without the journey we’ve shared with these players,” the coach continued. 
“We have that raw material, those wonderful Spanish footballers. 
And the way they compete, that is what brought us here. 
“That goes back many years.” 
De la Fuente, soft-spoken and professorial, is also scrupulously polite, an example many of his players follow. 
And while it is undoubtedly easier to display grace and dignity in victory than it is in defeat, the difference in the way Argentina and Spain exited the World Cup was far greater than the gap that separated them on the scoreboard, something De la Fuente unwittingly highlighted in speaking about his team late Sunday. 
“It seems people were surprised that, alongside talent and brilliance, good people can also play the game,” he said. 
“This proves that it is possible; that good, supportive, generous people with strong values can form a genuine team. 
“We played against the best national teams in the world, yet we were the best team. 
We demonstrated that a team built on good people  supportive people, people who hold values and principles that prioritize the common good over individual interests. 
Traveling with people like that makes for a better, safer journey.” 
In Spain’s case, it also makes a World Cup champion. 
Times staff writers Eduard Cauich and Jad El Reda contributed to this story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.1%Kevin Baxter: 4.1%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Kevin Baxter: 3.6%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.5%Kevin Baxter: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.5%This article: 1.2%Kevin Baxter: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.2%This article: 3.4%Kevin Baxter: 5.1%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Kevin Baxter: 3.6%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.9%Kevin Baxter: 11.2%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias30.9%This article: 5.7%Kevin Baxter: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Kevin Baxter: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias3.6%This article: 2.6%Kevin Baxter: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.6%This article: 13.4%Kevin Baxter: 5.9%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect13.4%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Kevin Baxter: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias4.9%This article: 3.4%Kevin Baxter: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem16.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Kevin Baxter: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 1.9%Kevin Baxter: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma1.9%This article: 0.5%Kevin Baxter: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.5%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Kevin Baxter: 6.3%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.5%Kevin Baxter: 6.0%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion15.5%This article: 1.7%Kevin Baxter: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 9.6%Kevin Baxter: 5.4%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.6%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.5%Kevin Baxter: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.5%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 6.2%Kevin Baxter: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division6.2%This article: 2.5%Kevin Baxter: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 4.9%Kevin Baxter: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman4.9%This article: 5.3%Kevin Baxter: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.2%Kevin Baxter: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 38.2%Kevin Baxter: 8.7%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice38.2%This article: 3.4%Kevin Baxter: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination3.4%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kevin Baxter: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1131 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers32%attributed speech770writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 60 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 25 words • 100.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLionel Scaloni • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 80 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 70 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 9 words • 100.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 26 words • 0.0% coverageLuis de la Fuente • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Luis de la Fuente

81%flagged-word coverage
253 attributed words70% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice-51.4 ptsWriter: 54.9%Luis de la Fuente: 3.6%3.6%Indoctrination-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Luis de la Fuente: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.