Speaker summary
36% 8 analyzed articles/videos 821.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis de la Fuente results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Optimism Bias , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,213.116 faulty-reasoning hits from 821.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,616 of 26,862 speakers). This Luis de la Fuente is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. Luis de la Fuente
Speaker details
Total words: 821.667
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score8 analyzed videos821.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst