Author summary
68% 37 analyzed articles/videos 12,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reuters results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Recency Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 6,360 hits . Analysis detected 55,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,775 analyzed words across 37 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,873 of 6,164 authors). This Reuters is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Reuters
Author details
Total words: 60,775
Article count: 37
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score37 analyzed articles60.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst