Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Honolulu Star-Advertiser results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 409 hits . Analysis detected 2,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,049 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 379 publications). This Honolulu Star-Advertiser is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,049
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.2% 9.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Publication 13.9% 13.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Publication 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 8.9% 8.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Publication 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 20.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Publication 13.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 11.4%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst