Publication summary
57% 284 analyzed articles/videos 154,992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Al Jazeera results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 81,504 hits . Analysis detected 636,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 794,606 analyzed words across 283 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 29% (268 of 375 publications). This Al Jazeera is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 794,606
Article count: 283
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score283 analyzed articles794.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst