Author summary
43% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enes Abuomer results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 820 hits . Analysis detected 5,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,091 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,435 of 6,162 authors). This Enes Abuomer is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Enes Abuomer
Author details
Total words: 6,091
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst