Author summary
68%7 analyzed articles/videos1,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Milan Durie results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,026 hits. Analysis detected 7,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,848 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,467 of 6,185 authors). This Alex Milan Durie is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Alex Milan Durie
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
61%Alex Milan Durie (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,848
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.6%7.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate