Author summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Quillen results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 2,495 hits . Analysis detected 14,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,298 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,009 of 6,348 authors). This Stephen Quillen is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Stephen Quillen
Author details
Total words: 7,298
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 5.3% BS Score11 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 34.2% 34.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.6% 14.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.6% 7.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 34.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 25.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst