Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Edna Mohamed results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 560 hits. Analysis detected 2,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,214 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,137 of 6,359 authors). This Edna Mohamed is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Edna Mohamed
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
83%Edna Mohamed (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,214
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
4.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.9%9.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 25.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate