Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Umut Uras results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 629 hits. Analysis detected 3,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,040 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (784 of 6,244 authors). This Umut Uras is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Umut Uras
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠88%Umut Uras (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,040
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510087.5% percentile
6.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.9%8.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.7%6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 23.6%23.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 30.8%30.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 30.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos