Author summary
68% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zsombor Peter results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,470 hits . Analysis detected 9,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,923 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,969 of 6,628 authors). This Zsombor Peter is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Zsombor Peter
Author details
Total words: 8,923
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.1% 16.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst