Author summary
86% 27 analyzed articles/videos 2,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lyndal Rowlands results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 3,648 hits . Analysis detected 22,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,921 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,577 of 6,359 authors). This Lyndal Rowlands is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Lyndal Rowlands
Author details
Total words: 13,921
Article count: 26
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score26 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.2% 26.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 13.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst