Author summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Hamill-Stewart results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 932 faulty-reasoning hits from 372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (228 of 6,359 authors). This Chris Hamill-Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
Chris Hamill-Stewart
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠97%Chris Hamill-Stewart (selected)13%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 372
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

96% percentile
025507510096.4% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles372 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 44.9%44.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 21.8%21.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 17.7%17.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 15.3%15.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 24.2%24.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.9%8.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 9.4%9.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 44.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 21.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.2%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 21.8%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 17.7%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos